job candidate says she would want to work for us secretly
A reader writes:
We interviewed a candidate for a part-time place who had been out of our line of labor for 10 years. I interviewed her as a result of she had another issues on her resume that appeared actually attention-grabbing (from a enterprise she’s been working with a member of the family). Nonetheless, we’re a quickly-changing trade and it’s uncommon to grant an interview to somebody who isn’t up on the newest developments. So I believed she can be completely satisfied after we determined to verify references and more than likely supply her the job.
Nevertheless, she instructed us she couldn’t present any work-related references — none in any respect — as a result of (a) those from our trade have been too previous; and (b) it was necessary that no person she offers with through her present enterprise is aware of she can be additionally working for us, as they needed to be beneath the impression that she is at her on-line job and accessible to them always. She supplied us two private references, each shut mates. We requested once more for anyone who may communicate to her work ethic, attitudes, demeanor, and so on. (a vendor, for instance, if she’d slightly not have prospects know). She once more refused. So we moved on with one other candidate.
The opposite candidate is nice, however I can’t assist however surprise how the primary particular person thought this might work if she did get the job. Is it regular for people who find themselves working small companies and have a aspect job to keep up this sort of secrecy between their two jobs? She didn’t even identify her enterprise on her resume — simply put “household enterprise” and talked about the important thing components of it. I discovered what it was as I’m within the matter her on-line platform covers. They’ve a strong platform, however she’s not working Microsoft. Why the secrecy? Would individuals she offers with for her on-line enterprise care if she had a job with us a number of days every week? How may it presumably be damaging?
One of the best clarification I’ve provide you with is that she is embarrassed that the enterprise is just not as worthwhile as she would love, which I assume is why she interviewed with us. However that’s such a standard factor in household companies, it’s laborious for me to see the way it may very well be necessary sufficient for her to lose a job over. What’s your take?
I reply this query over at Inc. immediately, the place I’m revisiting letters which have been buried within the archives right here from years in the past (and generally updating/increasing my solutions to them). You can learn it right here.