job candidate says she would want to work for us secretly
A reader writes:
We interviewed a candidate for a part-time place who had been out of our line of labor for 10 years. I interviewed her as a result of she had another issues on her resume that appeared actually attention-grabbing (from a enterprise she’s been working with a member of the family). Nonetheless, we’re a quickly-changing business and it’s uncommon to grant an interview to somebody who isn’t up on the newest developments. So I believed she could be blissful after we determined to test references and almost definitely provide her the job.
Nonetheless, she advised us she couldn’t present any work-related references — none in any respect — as a result of (a) those from our business have been too previous; and (b) it was essential that no one she offers with through her present enterprise is aware of she could be additionally working for us, as they needed to be underneath the impression that she is at her on-line job and out there to them always. She supplied us two private references, each shut pals. We requested once more for anyone who might converse to her work ethic, attitudes, demeanor, and so on. (a vendor, for instance, if she’d relatively not have clients know). She once more refused. So we moved on with one other candidate.
The opposite candidate is nice, however I can’t assist however marvel how the primary particular person thought this is able to work if she did get the job. Is it regular for people who find themselves working small companies and have a facet job to keep up this type of secrecy between their two jobs? She didn’t even title her enterprise on her resume — simply put “household enterprise” and talked about the important thing components of it. I discovered what it was as I’m within the matter her on-line platform covers. They’ve a stable platform, however she’s not working Microsoft. Why the secrecy? Would folks she offers with for her on-line enterprise care if she had a job with us just a few days per week? How might it presumably be damaging?
The very best rationalization I’ve give you is that she is embarrassed that the enterprise just isn’t as worthwhile as she would love, which I assume is why she interviewed with us. However that’s such a standard factor in household companies, it’s laborious for me to see the way it might be essential sufficient for her to lose a job over. What’s your take?
I reply this query over at Inc. at the moment, the place I’m revisiting letters which have been buried within the archives right here from years in the past (and typically updating/increasing my solutions to them). You can learn it right here.